Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reclaim Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:04, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reclaim Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fringe far-right group who've held two rallies. Getting 150 people to a rally doth not notability make, even if said two rallies made the newspapers. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but improve. Notability is there in reliable sources. --Decent Dan Moore (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I am really not seeing how this passes WP:NOTNEWS. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep while I may not agree with them they're well covered Alec Station (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- At the moment I haven't been able to find coverage I'd believe to fall under WP:GNG. But I haven't had time to search really thoroughly. It's mainly news coverage of some of the group's rallies. Certainly strikes me as violating WP:NOTNEWS at the moment. It doesn't help that the article is written like a summary of routine news coverage. I'm not voting delete however as there may well be sources that help it fulfill GNG; I haven't done a thorough enough job to be sure either way. If people find appropriate sources please ping me. -- Shudde ^talk 23:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There have been more than two rallies - other rallies were held subsequent to the post at the top of this page. The group is able to coordinate on a nationwide basis. Let's link to analysis and background articles as they appear, rather than just adding more links to general news coverage of individual rallies. Meticulo (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As unpleasant as they are, they have gained enough notability to warrant an article, as seen over the last weekend. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seem notable at the moment. If they vanish from public view this could be reassessed.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.