Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebekah Graf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rebekah Graf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, coverage doesn't rise above mere-mentions or tabloids, lead roles in The Dirt (film) and Capsized: Blood in the Water don't add up to WP:NACTOR. signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable enough and has stared in a few famous movies, although Variety alone seems to be the most notable source for the article information. Oaktree b (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The extent of coverage about the subject in the Variety article [1] is Though Butch has a kinda-sorta girlfriend (Rebekah Graf), his only real ally is 18-year-old sister Dawn (Chelsea Ricketts), who urges him to escape this unhappy home. This is not significant coverage signed, Rosguill talk 19:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Is the primary subject of several articles in reliable, independent sources. TheMusicExperimental (talk) 18:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you specify which sources you believe meet these criteria? signed, Rosguill talk 19:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails SIGCOV. ─ The Aafī (talk) 21:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Article subject may not be cited in substantial sources, but is starring or significant part of several prominent films. Subject matter has significance. Just an observation, but this would also justify articles for character actors who have parts in hundreds of films or other productions to warrant an article, even though there may not be multiple significant sources for that actor. Prussian-Hussar (talk) 00:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: A very borderline article, in my opinion. I feel that she is on the cusp of clearing the notability guidelines, and she seems to be on an upward trajectory. If the article is kept I would suggesting adding this Deadline source: here. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.