Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Curci
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect.--Kubigula (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the article is cruft. Most of the appearance section is unreferenced. If not deleted, it should in the very least, be merged to Nitro Girls. Thanks, Davnel03 15:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Article should be left alone and not deleted or merged . User:Cowboycaleb1 17:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have a reason? Davnel03 18:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You do know that if you don't provide a rational, then the admin will probably just ignore the fact that you even commented, right? The Hybrid 22:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —Nikki311 17:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect, most of the Nitro Girls do not have notable careers other than there time in the group (an exception being Stacy Keibler and a few others). There is a precedent for merging the individual articles of the members back into the Nitro Girls article. For example, Amy Crawford, Chae An, Vanessa Sanchez, and Jamie have all been merged and redirected there. Nikki311 18:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails the notability policy; there are only three different references for her. In addition, the "personal life" section amounts to a trivia/fancruft section, and the appearances section is almost entirely unsourced. I don't even see much worth merging, personally. I say delete it, and then turn it into a redirect. The Hybrid 22:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, I dont think there's any real reason to delete it, because there is nothing wrong with it as it is, but I'd like to know why users think it should be. Xchickenx 01:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per Nikki311. I cleaned up the page a little bit, but she still isn't notable enough to have her own article I guess. --Naha|(talk) 17:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.