Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Buck (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Buck (journalist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jouranlists are not default notable. The sources are all either about her dad, routine society coverage, employer job changes postings, or PR postings, none are substantial, indepdent 3rd party coverage about her. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At this time I don’t see a demonstration of notability for an article. ⌚️ (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG.-Splinemath (talk) 23:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cannot find much written about her.NotButtigieg (talk) 23:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet general notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The subject has the title of lead reporter for a cable news network, was named a scholar by her alma mater, and has worked for The New Yorker magazine The New York Times newspaper and CNN network - some of the largest media outlets in the country, thus the subject does not appear to an unnotable journalist as stated above. The article has been improved upon and a couple more sources were added (I counted 3 sources about her family out of 11 total sources, not all about her father or "society coverage"). Subject meets WP:BIO, WP:GNG and passes WP:JOURNALIST. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss the sources added by AuthorAuthor.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines. Other than the name mentions in event announcements in publications (obit, wedding party, etc. for references 1, 2, 3, 4). Others are primary sources (references 6, 8, 9, 10). References 5 and 7 are duplicated leading to the same passing mention. Ergo, subject lacks significant secondary source coverage. Lorelai1335 (talk) 13:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Lorelai1335[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.