Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rear-toading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Somebody moved it already to WP:BJAODN. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rear-toading[edit]

Two things wrong with this page: (1) - neologism if its not just (2) utter nonsense. CastAStone 19:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete now THAT is hilarious! WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 19:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 19:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The author really needs to cite some usages for this phrase. Even then, it would be better off in a dictionary rather than an encyclopædia. -- (aeropagitica) 20:06, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as utter nonsense and probable attack page. bikeable (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, patent nonsense, potentially offensive. The creator of the article has also taken the time to write other similar "articles", equally nonsensical and homophobic. Phaedriel 21:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.