Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reanimated (Family Force 5 album)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Reanimated (Family Force 5 album)[edit]
- Reanimated (Family Force 5 album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find evidence it meets WP:NALBUM Boleyn (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I'm seeing the sort of coverage one might expect for a notable but not-exactly-houshold-name artist. for example, Sputnik review. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Very borderline, but perhaps just enough to squeak by: a brief review [1], a longer review [2], and the album reached the top 10 of two genre-specific Billboard charts [3]. Gong show 00:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. In addition to the charts and the JFH and Allmusic reviews, there are reviews from HM [4], CCM Magazine [5], Indie Vision Music [6], New Release Tuesday [7], and Christian Music Zine. Also some brief coverage by Christian news and music outlets Breathecast, Cross Rhythms [8], The Christian Post [9], and WUFU [10].--¿3family6 contribs 03:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.