Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality Dudes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reality Dudes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think that the references are strong enough to establish notability. TheLongTone (talk) 14:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks non-trivial coverage by independent reliable sources needed to pass WP:WEBCRIT. The references in the article fail the independence, reliability or significant coverage tests. An independent search for sources gets only incidental mentions. There is nothing that reliably distinguishes the subject from run of the mill. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for unremarkable film studios. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.