Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real estate in Romania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Real estate in Romania[edit]

I'm nominating this article to form concensus on whether it's needed. We do seem to have articles on "Real estate in X", but as it is, this page is just a quote from here, altough it's most likely not a copyvio, considering it's part of the local law on the subject (unless laws are copyrighted in Romania). — Twinzor ^{Say hi!} 23:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, weakly. No opinion on the copyright issue, but the subject seems valid, and every article has to start somewhere. Might be profitably flagged for expert attention. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT 'Mere collections of public domain or other source material such as entire books or source code, original historical documents, letters, laws, proclamations, and other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, un-modified wording. Complete copies of primary sources may go into Wikisource, but not on Wikipedia.' (my emphasis). As it stands, nothing in the article is worth keeping so there's no reason why we can't delete it. If someone writes a valid article on it later (as Smerdis suggests) then they can simply create a new page with their content. Cynical (talk) 22:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:NOT.--Oliver Twisted (Talk) 06:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a valid topic, and a very short stub would suffice; but like this it really doesn't pass criteria. Anyone with any idea of real estate in Romania could turn this into something worthy of keeping; but as I haven't a clue about the subject, I know I can't. Second Smerdis' call for an expert. Nyttend (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this could be a valid topic, but this isn't the way its supposed to be written. There's not normally a CP issue with a law, but the article would actually have to be about the market rather than the just the law itself. --Bobak (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the nominator pretty much summed up my reasoning. Tavix (talk) 20:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.