Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Custom Games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Real Custom Games[edit]
- Real Custom Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Halo clan that does not appear to meet WP:ORG. Discussion on notability has been ongoing on Talk:Real Custom Games, but article author has failed to produce any reliable and genuinely independent sources for notability. No Google News Archive hits, no Alexa ranking for the clan Web site. —Caesura(t) 16:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a group on Halo, they aren't notable. The article is completely lacking in reliable sources. Even if they were instrumental in creating a playlist, they still aren't notable. --Cyrus Andiron 17:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable group. I had originally speedied it but removed the tag when the author offered to find and insert more third-party sources. Apparently this did not happen. ... discospinster talk 18:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rebutal There are no other reliable third party source according to Wiki's version of a third party source. However, the Bungie Studios new stories is a third party source as the two are completely separate organizations. However, I will accept the deletion of the article and might possibly look for ways to contribute to the site. Thanks for your time.
GaTech92 (talk) 02:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 04:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable gaming clan. My prod tag was removed, and I thot that I was being generous, as I don't consider an online group's claim of only 160 members an 'assertion of notability' that would put it above {{db-club}}. Ravenna1961 (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.