Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RealSound (RS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am not seeing any clear Keep arguments and this has already been relisted. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RealSound (RS)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. Fails WP:GNG & WP:CORP. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Za wl 15:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added AllMusic, they do exist and made recordings that look notable. Can't do more right now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Between AllMusic and the "official" site, it appears they are mostly a classical-music producer of some VERY high profile classical recordings, and a recording studio. They released CDs under their own name in the 90s to about 2005, including several notable artists. Probably notable under NMUCIS#5, but very difficult to find sources, searching "RealSound" or "Real Sound" gives you lots of chaff to wade through. Except for the artist list, the article gives no useful information for a discographer, music historian, or musicologist, so I'm not all that inclined to say 'keep' as having encyclopedic value. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article consists of little more than a definition. It doesn't assert any notability or give any actual information about the company. The only external links are to the company's own homepage. JIP | Talk 13:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.