Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reagan Charleston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 18:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reagan Charleston

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability outside of the show. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm not familiar with the reality TV show she was on. Bearian (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Bearian, hi. Neither was I. It's a struggling show on Bravo, with about 600k viewers. Cancelled after the 2019 season. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I simply don't agree with the nomination neither do I agree with the language used about how this is a struggling show that got cancelled. The TV star is all over the news and no she doesn't get discussed only in the context of the show. Maybe many of the news articles refer to her as Southern Charm star in title and throughout the text but not that is only what she gets discussed for. I can go ahead and post links to to the lots of articles she was in, but google news will do. DavidLe (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:49, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 04:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Several hits in GNews bring up People magazine (a few times) and other sources, for this "star". While I don't think she is a star, she's notable. Oaktree b (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I guess. I'm conflicted on this, but the article's got enough proper sources. No one cares about her, but she's allowed to have her article, I guess. AdoTang (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.