Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ready10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ready10

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims of notability, yes. Substantial and credible enough? I think not. TheLongTone (talk) 12:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All sources in article are to insider journals promoting stories about similar companies. No other WP:RS (third party) found on a Google News or other searches. This PR company might well become notable in the future - but is WP:TOOSOON right now, despite its own video stating it has attained 1,925 pieces of earned media in its lifetime. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from the companies who employ them to do their PR. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advert. Szzuk (talk) 20:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.