Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading Railroad Heritage Museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Reading Railroad Heritage Museum

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Reading Railroad Heritage Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable small local museum, open just a few hours per week. There is no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Currently the references are local news coverage (the museum will put up Christmas lights this year), the organization's own website, and a Facebook page. Beyond that, WP:BEFORE turns up little more than directory listings and other non-significant coverage. Peacock (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. See refs at 1, 2 and 3. Mccapra (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep It seems easy to find detailed coverage such as this. Deletion would not be sensible as there's such an obvious alternative: merger with Reading Railroad. Andrew D. (talk) 09:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep: Notable as per above. SL93 (talk) 23:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Physical infrastructure. scope_creep^Talk 00:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep - has accrued coverage in local media and one print source, and so likely meets WP:GNG.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.