Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Readdle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Readdle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've no doubt that the apps are noteworthy and they have their own pages, but the references for the company fails NCORP, just the usual advertorials, interviews with founders, announcements, etc. I am unable to locate any references that meet both WP:CORPDEPTH *and* WP:ORGIND as per NCORP requirements. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable company sourced to PR fluff Dexxtrall (talk) 11:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.