Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reachfm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep; redirected to WREH. Alexius08 (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reachfm[edit]

Most of the article is copied from reachfm. What is not copied from there is copied from WREH, (check history for exact match, that I have reverted). Article appears to be in violation of NPOV, blatant advertising and notability. MatthewYeager 04:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that is true it should be tagged as a copyright violation. Unfortunately the station's site is down, so I can't check that. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, easy. Redirect to the existing WREH, which eliminates the copyvio problems (although we might want to mark them, if the copyvio turns out to be true). Also eliminates that ugly odor of spam. whew! --Lockley (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. FYI, looks like a small edit war going on at WREH. The user Ckeiler1, whose only edits are on Reachfm and WREH, keeps re-inserting this same text into that page. This is material that looks strongly promotional in tone. I'll make a note on the talk page for WREH, and, you know what, I'm going to go ahead and redirect the page. My mind can be changed; just trying to be proactive. --Lockley (talk) 16:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This nom should be withdrawn as Reachfm simply redirects to the callsign (as made sense anyway). Mangoe (talk) 11:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.