Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razvan albu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Razvan albu

Non-notable musician by an SPA. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:V, WP:RS. Biruitorul ^Talk 17:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficent notability per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC. Schuym1 (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: "non-notable" is a relative concept. This artist makes several appearances on Internet search engines. I think the page should be kept, seeing how none of the information is contradictory/false.

Assessments of notability is based on agreed upon policy herewp:notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC) As such, there is no information mentioned there that deems this artist as non-notable.[reply]

Delete: insufficient 3rd party sources WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 00:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC). I disagree; among 3rd party sources found: www.unsigned.com, www.myspace.com, www.razvanalbu.ro, www.bandizmo.com, www.facebook.com, as well as dozens of entries in web directories.[reply]
Delete No evidence that it meets inclusion guidelines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.