Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razgulay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Just because company went bankrupt does not mean that it was not notable. Is sourced and passes GNG as was at one point one of the largest agribusiness companies in Russia and statement is backed by RS. With that said, would like to see additional third party sources and the article expanded. Please note that notability is not temporary. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Razgulay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company is defunct and may have just barely met WP:NCORP and WP:GNG at one time. The website for the company is offline and the little information available about it are bankruptcy proceedings. It was also traded on a now-closed stock platform. Doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH due to the lack of depth of coverage and the only mentions about it have been trivial. Jip Orlando (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. bd2412 T 18:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the nominator, "may have just barely met WP:NCORP and WP:GNG at one time." Notabiity is not temporary and does not go away when a company goes bankrupt. It was "was one of Russia's largest agribusiness companies" per the article. A major company usually gets more than trivial mentions. Sources likely exist, though perhaps not online and not in English, to satisfy the requirements of WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article says, Razgulay was at one point the largest agribusiness concern in Russia, the fact that it is now bankrupt does not change that. Also, the Moscow Exchange is not 'closed'.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.