Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayse Tiger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Still needs sources, but the sources are out there. Malinaccier (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rayse Tiger

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Plenty of real life info. There is no WP:DEADLINE on improvement. _ Mgm|^(talk) 09:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or rdirect. Nothing is alleged here that would justify complete deletion, so it was wrong to bring it to afd. I doubt anyone would seriously defend this as an individual article, so it should have been possible to find a compromise merge solution for this whole group of articlsee previous afd for more detailed comments. DGG (talk) 08:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. like Mgm. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Needs better sourcing. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.