Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Lubitz
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 00:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Raymond Lubitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. LK (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I created this article. The book Anarchy, State and Utopia by Robert Nozick lists a number of people on page 310, to illustrate how different individual human beings are from one another. Raymond Lubitz is among the people listed. I know he is not particularly prolific otherwise. But I'm surely not the only one to read that enumeration and wonder who all these people are. And all of them (other than Lubitz) already had respective articles on Wikipedia. I'll see if I can dig up more about him. Gabbe (talk) 08:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 09:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 09:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. GS citations too slender for notability yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough here for WP:PROF nor WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.