Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond E. Foster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 23:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond E. Foster

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is almost entirely unsourced. Of three sources provided one is dead and two are passing mentions insufficient to establish notability. Mccapra (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 06:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 06:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find any quality RS where the subject of the piece was on him; most I get are passing references/name-checking is 2nd tier (and lower) RS (which is unusual for a media-BLP that claims to have worked with History Channel etc.). Article is a CV and unambigiously WP:PROMO. Britishfinance (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I'm not even going to get into assessing notability, this is a WP:NOTLINKEDIN failure. SITH (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I also note he fails the prof test as an adjunct. Bearian (talk) 01:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a long profile of Foster (behing Proquest paywall) Rounding Up Criminals From All Corners; Using diplomatic skills, LAPD's Fugitive Warrant Section detectives work with other agencies to track down fugitives.: [HOME EDITION

Blankstein, Andrew. Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif. [Los Angeles, Calif]07 Feb 2003: B.2. ]. Article is certainly C.V. style PROMO. But it may be that he is notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No claim of notability. Does not meet WP:SOLDIER, WP:AUTHOR or WP:ACADEMIC Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly promotional in tone and content. Unlikely to meet WP:GNG. Grey Wanderer (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.