Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Vega

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Vega[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional blurb for a porn producer. Searches for his name and those of the companies he supposedly founded only find Wikipedia mirrors, although the owner of "MobBucks" used to be one Mike Vega, who also appears non-notable. [1] The provided sources are all deadlinks; I couldn't find the originals in the Internet Archive, and it doesn't look like they would be RS anyway. Not to be confused with Ray Vega (singer) or the jazz trumpeter. FourViolas (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Difficult to find any sources, which suggests that the person is not notable. The only sources listed in the article are dead, but two are archived - [2] [3], and they are not significant coverage that would indicate notability. Hzh (talk) 16:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:PROMO and also fails WP:GNG with niche sources Atlantic306 (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, hasn't won any notable or significant awards, fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet WP:ENT and the article is kind of a fluff job, possibly written by the subject himself. Doesn't really tell us anything. You could pretty much run up the same kind of bio on any individual with a camera who wanted to call himself a producer. "Known for colorful advertisements ..." Like what, for instance? Very vague, non-specific with no verifiability to speak of. — Maile (talk) 23:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.