Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawan Nada
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Dinesh Subasinghe. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Rawan Nada[edit]
- Rawan Nada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable album. Does not satisfy the criteria under WP:NALBUMS. Dan arndt (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 10. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. User:Dan arndt Dan arndt (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 03:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Links and references for 'rawan nada'(Ravan Nada) (User:Musiclanka talk)
- there are many links can be found.even oline purchasing ones too,and can be found in local news papers about
- Ravannada or Rawan nada.same about one album
- Articles
- http://archives.dailynews.lk/2009/04/01/fea21.asp Ravan nada goes big time Data can be found about the 'rawan nada Album
- http://www.sundaytimes.lk/090524/Magazine/sundaytimesmagazine_00.html In search of Ravana in Sri Lanka Sata can be found in the 11 th paragraph regarding on the album - Comment this is simply a passing reference that Subasinghe released the CD.
- http://www.snipview.com/q/Rawan_Nada - Comment this just repeats the WP article (see WP:CIRC)
- http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2009/04/19/rev03.asp Reviving the tunes of the past data can be found in 4th paragraph - Comment this is simply a passing reference that Subasinghe released the CD.
- http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2428806912/nm5653084 imdb - Comment a photograph of the artist with CD does not establish notability
- http://archives.dailynews.lk/2012/12/19/fea21.asp Data can be found under the topic of musical stint - Comment this is simply a passing reference that Subasinghe released the CD.
- Articles
- online links for listning and purchasing
- http://www.amazon.fr/Rawan-Nada-Dinesh-Subasinghe/dp/B00IA7RL16
- https://itunes.apple.com/lk/album/rawan-nada/id815187773
- http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=9253972
- http://www.mixrad.io/in/en/products/Dinesh-Subasinghe/Rawan-Nada/65396201
- www.rhapsody.com/artist/dinesh-subasinghe/album/rawan-nada
- online links for listning and purchasing
- Comment The above links only show that the album was released by a Dinesh Subasinghe, which in accordance with WP:NALBUMS is not by itself reason for a standalone article. The above-mentioned links fail to establish any notability for the album, they are just an indication that the album exists.Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 13:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 13:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Dinesh Subasinghe LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.