Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raw and Uncutt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raw and Uncutt[edit]

Lack of reliable sources, plus it's not even an official album since it was not released by any of Interscope, Aftermath, Shady or Universal International that are Eminem's official distribution labels. As it can be seen here is was released by a probable bootleg label "AFE" Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 22:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Bootleg album, fails WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MUSIC "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable" -- Coasttocoast (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources, fails WP:MUSIC. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.