Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Abeysuriya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Closing as there is a clear consensus to keep, given the submissions are unianimous. The only submission for delete has been changed to keep. There is no active discussion ongoing, with no reasonable prospect of the consensus changing. (non-admin closure) — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Abeysuriya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not WP:BIO Cossde (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Sri Lanka, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Is this supposed to be a resume? What is this? This fails WP:BIO. TarnishedPath^talk 12:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Keep per sources shown below. TarnishedPath^talk 10:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Many in-depth news stories about him in national-level newspapers. Appears to be a clear pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. based on number of present references it should be kept. See 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8.Royal88888 (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have seen credible sources about the subject and hence it should be complying with WP:GNG. Abishe (talk) 00:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.