Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational Publishing Engine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rational Software#Products. I don't really understand the conversation that took place here, but, I am making an "executive decision" based on the one suggestion. Missvain (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Rational Publishing Engine[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rational Publishing Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. There are no independent sources Jcarlosmartins (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rational_Software#Products. I have copied text from the lead there and the history of this page needs to remain available for attribution purposes. ~Kvng (talk) 16:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- I had to remove your changes as you did not provide sources. Please, add any sources to be able to have a redirect. Jcarlosmartins (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- I had to revert that because the material is not unsourced and WP:DEMOLISH ~Kvng (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, you are adding unsourced content and that is not acceptable. --Jcarlosmartins (talk) 15:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Technically, I am moving unsourced material. Is that also not acceptable? Seems like that would put us on the slippery slope to removing all unsourced material. ~Kvng (talk) 15:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Unsourced material must be removed from Wikipedia. Please, add refereces to the content if you want to move it. Please, see: Wikipedia:Verifiability --Jcarlosmartins (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Technically, I am moving unsourced material. Is that also not acceptable? Seems like that would put us on the slippery slope to removing all unsourced material. ~Kvng (talk) 15:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, you are adding unsourced content and that is not acceptable. --Jcarlosmartins (talk) 15:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- I had to revert that because the material is not unsourced and WP:DEMOLISH ~Kvng (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.