Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rathore clan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. plicit 03:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rathore clan[edit]

Rathore clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODded by Ranadhira (talk · contribs) with rationale, referring to Rathore dynasty:

There is already a Rathore dynasty page for the historical clan and a surname page for the modern surname. Unnecessary copy of Rathore dynasty

This PROD, and several cleanup edits by the same user, was reverted by page creator Hanshingling (talk · contribs), a user who claimed to be using a large language model and is now blocked per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption; and then restored by Re Packer&Tracker (talk · contribs). –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and India. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I concur with this nomination, quite obviously Hanshingling is not here to improve the encyclopedia as is apparent from their editing pattern. Plus, they are now socking as well to evade their block, see here diff. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 03:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 02:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.