Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapydscript

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2014 April 10.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rapydscript

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Mentions I can find are all by the author(s) of the language. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 08:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 08:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 08:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete - no 3rd party reliable sources to establish notability; created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I could find no reliable third-party sources for this, so I believe it fails WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.