Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranger (Game Class)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. - Mailer Diablo 14:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ranger (Game Class)[edit]

Game-cruft. Article provides no context and verifiability. Fails policies like WP:NOR, WP:V and WP:NPOV. ---J.S (t|c)

Do as you wish. I really don't care. ---FE411 {t|c}

I'm open to persuasion. Convince me... or make the article better and I'll withdraw this nomination. ---J.S (t|c) 04:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 12:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ranger (character class). We don't need an RfA for this. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 12:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect would be useless... and it would fail RfD. Who would search for "Ranger (Game Class)"? ---J.S (t|c) 22:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per RandyWang Percy Snoodle 12:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect- per randywang.--Peephole 13:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per RandyWang. --SevereTireDamage 20:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, Redirect per RandyWang. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 12:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 21:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.