Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Petersen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to FlyerTalk. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 17:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Petersen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a promotional campaign for him and his enterprises. The one ref is a dead link, and not findable at least by me. Nor does Google shown much else. It is possible that Inside Flyer or FlyerTalk is more notable than he is himself . Alternatively, the two publications/sites could perhaps be moved in here DGG ( talk ) 19:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE (talk • contributions) 00:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to FlyerTalk. This article has two paragraphs on him; a Globe and Mail article is largely trivial mentions of him in reviewing FlyerTalk. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:47, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus even after twour relists
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 02:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.