Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy M. Grossman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per author request under WP:CSD#G7 and the current consensus here. For what it's worth, I agree that calling it a "weak" law school was unnecessary.--Kubigula (talk) 03:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Randy M. Grossman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. He is just an adjunct professor at a weak law school and a minor sports agent Blahblah5555 (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He may not be as important as your Mormon polygamist, but he is fairly renowned in the world of sports and has links on Wikipedia. Hotcop2 (talk) 11:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This comes pretty close to a personal attack on the nominator based on the first linked article on Blah's userpage. Please stick to the topic of notability and back up claims with sources for the most credibility. --Dhartung | Talk 16:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - OK, I looked around for some sources. I could not find anything significant and could not find links to articles in NY Times or the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. I think this may be a case of notability not being inherited, as Dave Winfield seems to be the notable subject here. Maybe this info could be merged into that article? TN‑X-Man 14:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, being a sports agent for a notable athlete does not automatically confer notability, even if some sports agents do become notable. --Dhartung | Talk 16:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete please remove immediately. That solves that. As far as "close to a personal attack" -- I'm reacting to his snippy remarks (in the same snippy voice) about the man and the law school. Why don't you delete the page on the "weak" law school while you're at it?Hotcop2 (talk) 02:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged for WP:CSD#G7 per page blanking and above comment. --Dhartung | Talk 23:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.