Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Fontes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Fontes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG, fringe scientist with almost no sources. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 00:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only evidence that he actually seems to have done something (other than vague statements that he's been mentioned elsewhere) is in relation to this book which of course shows two mentions. I'm not seeing the indication that he passes WP:PROF which I guess would be the relevant standard. However, the five year old prior AFD is odd to put it mildly. It seems to have based on this version at that time so I'm open to reconsideration. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable scientist. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per lack of reliable sources. HealthyGirl (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.