Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana P. Singh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Rana P. Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability criteria under WP:PROF. Appears to be a resume posted by an affiliated researcher. Dunready (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A resume is a resume and not an article for an encyclopedia. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a probable copyvio. I suspect this is true because the [footnotes are in brackets] like [8], and were probably copied from a blog, faculty website, or private server. Also,, he badly fails the prof test. Bearian (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:NOTCV. DrStrauss talk 16:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:PROF. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.