Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Muhammad Akram Khan (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. ✗plicit 05:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rana Muhammad Akram Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article about a non-notable advocate. There is no reference that is directly about him. Fails WP:GNG. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock
He is elected representative of lawyers body since very long, some of the sources not traceable on the web, some in urdu language, but He is notable politician-advocate on the face of it as he is covered by international media and held a notable position as chairman executive punjab bar council. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.25.233 (talk) 06:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- See WP:AUTOBIO. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.