Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesvara Swami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Waggers (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ramesvara Swami

Sources that are presented do not appear to be anything but self published works. Hard to imagine that he should be considered notable. MBest-son (talk) 22:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added two references from the Los Angeles Times. I would remind the nominator of the importance of checking for sources before nominating an article for deletion. --Eastmain (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As well as the LA Times sources there's a whole chapter about the subject in this book. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to International Society for Krishna Consciousness, I see very little which warrants an independent article. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 22:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Coccyx Bloccyx. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note - the individuals notability if any, is only as a member of ISKCON thus article should be merged or redirected. He is not notable otherwise and have not connection to ISKCON. Its a BLP, he is not using this name, and this move will comply with policies. Wikidās ॐ 09:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Phil Bridger.Baka man 02:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - the individuals notability if any, is only as a member of ISKCON thus article should be merged or redirected. He is not notable otherwise and has no connection to ISKCON. Its a BLP, he is not using this name, and this move will comply with policies. Agreed!--Rickbrown9 (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Person looks to be notable. At any rate there's no consensus to do the redirect. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 05:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.