Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rambo films on television

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rambo films on television

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to deserve its own topic. If this information (which has just been copied wholesale from imdb anyway) is to remain, it would be best served on each individual film page, or possibly on the film series page. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing that can't be mentioned in the various Rambo films' articles if necessary.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 15:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as it amounts to a trivia section, or a repost of what can be found in IMDB's "alternate versions" section. Tarc (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This material belongs in the articles about each Rambo film, if at all. IMDB is not a reliable source, and I imagine much of this article is original research anyways. PDCook (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nearly every movie shown on TV is edited either for content or time. Documenting these changes isn't the job of an encyclopedia. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Starblind. Hard to imagine we need entire articles on edited-for-TV films, particularly considering how many significant US films still lack articles. Firsfron of Ronchester 19:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the movie articles have this information within the body of their articles, but I always regard it as fancruft in the first place. This is no different; networks always edit movies for content and time. This is not any different at all. Nate • (chatter) 23:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See also this discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films/Archive_29#Films_on_television_--_new_category_needed.3F. StevePrutz (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Information about what's been edited out or edited in to a particular film by TV networks should be part of an article about that film. Important within the context of those films, but not important enough for its own separate article. Mandsford (talk) 15:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.