Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph G. Caso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 00:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph G. Caso[edit]

local politician, fails WP:BIO#Basic criteria, WP:POLITICIAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielPenfield (talk • contribs)

Keep the New York Times saw fit to print a 730 word obituary[1] on him. - Icewedge (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for reasons stated above. JamesMLane t c 02:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —JamesMLane t c 03:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being a county executive or having an obituary in the NY Times are far from satisfying WP:POLITICIAN. Where is the substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources needed to satisfy [[WP:N}? Edison2 (talk) 04:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant elected position. Obviously notable. Edward321 (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Of the obit isn't enough some of the sources listed [2] (most are behind paywalls but the headlines look good) might be usefull. Eluchil404 (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.