Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph A. Midkiff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph A. Midkiff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Subject of article lacks the significant independent coverage required so fails WP:GNG Nuttah (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability. Wikipedia is not the place to post your resume. Edward321 (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only one of the cited articles is actually about him (as opposed to about a case he was involved in with a quote or two from him). The much-hyped "world record" settlement turns out to be hedged with a lot of fine print. All in all, not notable. --MelanieN (talk) 04:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources are legitimate, with more sources than Rusty Hardin or Dick Deguerin and they have passed the notability test. Possible movement into a catagory might be necessary or useful.--Greyhelm1 (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2010 (CST)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.