Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakamakafo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:12, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rakamakafo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopaedic, tone inappropriate, and, though not direct advertising, appears to have been created for publicity purposes. Adam9007 (talk) 00:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This really should be removed. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Editing and discussion -Arcticle can be improved. Just need some more content and sources of information. It doesn't have any adverstiment, only information about the channel itself and its creation. Kekcuk264 (talk) 9:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Editing and discussion - Should be corrected for grammar and use more sources Lewlight (talk)10:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewlight (talk • contribs) [reply]
- Account has been blocked as possible sock puppet. --Soetermans. T / C 14:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to establish notability, no third-party references. Number of subscribers or views is not by itself sufficient to warrant an article. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - might be popular, but that doesn't mean it's notable. --Soetermans. T / C 14:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as although I found my best search results at News, there's not much to suggest better improvement. WP:TNT and start again when better. SwisterTwister talk 06:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.