Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Rijal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raju Rijal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's subject fails WP:NCRIC and therefore the WP:GNG. Longstanding consensus at WP:CRIC that under-19 international cricketers are not inherently notable.GreenCricket ^TALK 10:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and salt. No change since the last AfD. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No one is suggesting "inherent" notability however I believe Rijal meets WP:GNG AusLondonder (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only sources about him are about 1 event (whether he's under 19 or not), fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While there seems to be some coverage of the age issue, that's all there is on this individual at the moment. Hasn't played a match that passes WP:NCRIC (yet). No issue on recreation if/when that happens. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.