Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajgopal Sharma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rajgopal Sharma[edit]

Rajgopal Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a government bureaucrat with no discernible claim of encyclopedic notability; the strongest thing here is that he won an internal staff award presented by his own employer, and the only reference cited here at all is a 78-word blurb in a bureaucrat's trade magazine. None of this makes him notable, and the sourcing doesn't get him over WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per Nom. InsertCleverPhraseHere 06:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A WP:SPA article on a man with a job, complete with peacockery about the qualities of his children. The supporting reference is a routine position announcement and I can find little better than a passing mention as a passenger in a helicopter that suffered a minor mishap [1]. Does not meet biographical notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.