Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeev Gandhi Memorial Boarding School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - the nomination has been withdrawn without any dissenting 'delete' views. TerriersFan (talk) 01:58, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeev Gandhi Memorial Boarding School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~The article is unreferenced, and I could not find any possible independent, reliable sources. Seems to fail WP:ORG and WP:GNG. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 17:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)~~ I withdraw this nomination since the concerns have been addressed: sources have been added to the article. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 22:06, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not only a senior high school but a boarding school to boot. We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian schools; very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and wait until local sources can be researched. TerriersFan (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for my usual reasons. Verified secondary school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Most of the Indian schools tend to reduce their publicity through e-media, which doesn't mean that they lack the "stuff" for an encyclopedic article. The article may lack enough citations, but we can work together in rescuing it. bc-ndra (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep verified secondary school. Boleyn (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.