Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Sundernath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath. It's been merged, so we're left with little choice but to redirect. -Splash^talk 23:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Sundernath[edit]

not notable, no reliable source, only linked from one article Baba Louis 19:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails Google test with only 9 results [1], most of which are from Wikipedia. Also see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yogiraj_Gurunath_Siddhanath. --Alan Au 20:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete,NN --Deville (Talk) 22:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --999 20:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, there is now a reliable source - a university press. There are now 3 written accounts on Sundernath from 3 distinct sources, one of which is published by a university press. Hamsacharya dan 09:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, this is not true. The third source mentions a Sundarnath Siddha, who cannot be the same individual since Sund'e'rnath, the Mahant of the Gorakhnath Temple, died in 1924 while Sund'a'rnath Siddha is said to have lived until the 1970s. Any attempted conflation of these apparently distinct individuals would be speculation and original research. In any case, "Sundarnath Siddha" also fails the Google test with 0 results [2]. —Adityanath 14:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (changed from Abstain). The pertinent data has been merged into Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath in preparation for deletion. I agree that the subject is non-notable. —Adityanath 05:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable enough[3]. There are too many yogis, sadhus, swamis and mahatmas... We don't need an article on each one of them. utcursch | talk 04:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.