Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's hardly any information here and, although a company affiliated with Nepal's king may be notable, this is simply the son-in-law. Also, this company may not exist anymore as it has not been significantly edited since starting in January 2006 and my searches found no recent or significant for that matter coverage, with the best results being this and here. Pinging the only editor that would seem possibly interested Bachrach44. SwisterTwister talk 22:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I think Sachindra Shrestha might be the only one who would care - s/he created the article in 2006 and that remains the only significant edit. --Bachrach44 (talk) 20:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bachrach44 I'm sure but I almost never ping someone who was obviously a SPA account from 2006 so chances are they're never coming back. I pinged you in case you wanted to comment. SwisterTwister talk 20:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. no evidence to support notability DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.