Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rain Fell Within

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rain Fell Within[edit]

Rain Fell Within (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable as my searches found nothing better than this and this (FWIW, I also found a forum here), despite searching at News, Books, browsers, Highbeam, Kerrang!, Terrorizer and Blabbermouth. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I couldn't really find anything to show that this band is notable enough for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I see a few reviews on blogs, but that's about it. Doesn't look like they ever attracted any mainstream attention in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.