Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Verma Rajput

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Verma Rajput[edit]

Rahul Verma Rajput (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason

Non notable actor with no mention about him on any search engine. HelloDolly89 (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. HelloDolly89 (talk) 06:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TopCipher (talk) 07:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TopCipher (talk) 07:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. TopCipher (talk) 07:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted here are links http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7917282/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5457772/fullcredits/ http://www.filmihood.com/movies/sarrainodu-2016-telugu-movie/ https://www.cinemaclock.com/movies/sarrainodu-2016 http://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/apherald-epaper-apherald/sarrainodu+telugu+movie+review+rating-newsid-52356406 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.213.198.142 (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No mention any where. Just a supporting character in one movie he worked. Kvs90bc (talk) 06:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
 – Updated article with references. SPMTelugu (talk) 00:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The provided sources show that the movie he was in is eminently notable, but there's nothing there to show that he is notable. I found nothing better. Article creator's comment above was originally inserted in place of the discussion template--I've also reverted the creator's poorly-executed attempt to prematurely close the discussion. --Finngall talk 01:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This popped at WP:BADAFD due to the author removing the AFD tags... so now I'm looking at it. And on the merits, there's no indication of notability under our rules. But the actor is fairly young, so maybe WP:USUAL applies and they get an article when they meet our criteria. But not yet. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. "notability is not inherited" -- Aunva6talk - contribs 03:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.