Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Varma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Varma[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single notable source. Fails WP:GNG Sonia89f (talk) 03:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's a potentially valid notability claim here as artistic director of a theatre company, but that's not an automatic inclusion freebie — he has to be sourced well enough to clear WP:GNG for that, but the referencing here, which is dependent primarily on the self-published website of the theatre company itself and a piece of his own writing in an academic journal, is not getting him there. And furthermore, part of the article is an advertorialized promobumf for his most recent play (or at least the most recent one that anybody's bothered to add here at all — there's been at least one new play since then, according to Google.) No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can source it better, and write it more neutrally, than this, but this as written ain't cutting it. Bearcat (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can’t find any reliable source. Non notable.. HelloDolly89 (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.