Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Mahajan (blogger)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Wikicology (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Mahajan (blogger)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable blogger. Mr. Guye (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It did take some digging, as the man shares his name with a TV personality, but I did find enough to show that Mahajan is notable as a whole. His books have received coverage (as well as being in about 200-300 libraries) and Mahajan has also received coverage in other aspects as well. His work also seems to be fairly frequently cited as a RS ([1], [2]) as a whole, although that's sort of an aside since being a RS doesn't automatically mean notability. I'm more mentioning that because I'm finding some evidence that his books are used in college courses as textbooks ([3]) as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—Nice work by Tokyogirl79. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:58, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since the nomination, Tokyogirl79 has both added reliable sources to the article, demonstrating notability, and removed promotional content. Nice work. --Mark viking (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per above comments. Walentinee (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.