Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahmat Samii

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Tim Vickers (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rahmat Samii

Vanispamcruftisement created by the subject's child, the single-purpose account Ali4nia (talk · contribs), who contested the WP:PROD ... absolutely no reliable sources to verify the WP:BIO criteria ... also possible copyright violation of subject's website. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 20:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not the place to upload CVs/resumes. Also, the copyright is unclear. Narayanese (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, zero hits on Google Scholar and Pubmed. Possibly hoax. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 22:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability problems aside, none of the info in the article appears verifiable. In particular, all the googlescholar hits[1] for "Rahmat Samii" appear to be not for a physician but for an engineer named Yahya Rahmat-Samii (who is a professor at UCLA and who does appear to be notable). Nsk92 (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That about the engineer reminds me that I looked into it a few months ago when it was prodded. As I recall, he exists and wrote the book on AIDS published by FRISON-ROCHE, but that took some work to find, and there is very little other information. The engineer is notable.John Z (talk) 00:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete — strongly and clearly fails WP:NOT; this is not the place for resumes. Forecast calls for WP:SNOW in the future. MuZemike (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per all above, nothing to add. --triwbe (talk) 07:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.