Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rage Parasuram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rage Parasuram[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. He served as Mayor of an small city and state general secretary of YSR Congress Party which are not notable positions. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and India. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NPOL, no WP:GNG — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if @Goldsztajn's comment was to my !vote or the nominator's, but clarifying my comment above as "does not meet WP:NPOL (SNG), neither does WP:GNG" — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DaxServer not specifically at you, just the general discussion. The nomination contains no actual policy/guideline basis for deletion (or evidence of BEFORE); however, as your contribution asserts no passing of the GNG, there is a basis for the nomination to proceed (hence my comment, rather than calling for a procedural close). Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment One cannot "fail" NPOL. NPOL is a positive test indicative of presumed notability, not the basis to determine deletion. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nom and Daxserver. Semantics aside. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.