Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raffaella Fico
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Raffaella Fico[edit]
- Raffaella Fico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completing nomination for anonymous editor 93.186.23.81, whose rationale was posted on the article's talk page and is included verbatim below. Relevant guidelines to consider include the General Notability Guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (people). On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Raffaella Fico does not meet Wikipedia/English Wikipedia's guidline for notability. 93.186.23.81 (talk) 00:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete: Appears non-notable other than in her relation with Mario Balotelli, and that is covered sufficiently in his article. Samwalton9 (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If you had spent a couple of minutes to make a quick search before voting here you would have found that appearances are deceptive. Cavarrone (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, I was a little too brief with my searching. I don't necessarily vote to keep but removing my delete vote. Samwalton9 (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious Keep, [1], lazy nom and patent lack of WP:BEFORE. A simple search in Google News reveals hundreds of articles and sources about her in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, well before her relation with Mario Balotelli. Probably she does not deserve this notability but she is indeed notable and she widely meets WP:GNG and WP:ENT. Cavarrone (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Following correction and improvement by Cavarrone. Samwalton9 (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - looks like she scrapes it.Deb (talk) 12:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - she is notable. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails notability criteria. Elmo420v (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) — Elmo420v (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- KeepA well know showgirl.User:Lucifero4
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.